Can we please not?

Can we please not blame mass killings on people’s brains? Can we not say that Adam Lanza committed the Newton, Connecticut massacre because he might have been autistic? Can we not say that Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the deceased Boston Marathon bombing suspect, might have committed the crime because he had boxing-related traumatic brain damage? Can we not say that his younger brother, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, aided in the bombings because he was a teenager and his brain hadn’t fully developed yet, and thus he was easily influenced by his radical older brother?

Just like can we please not place blame on these people because they are Muslim or Christian (or not), can we not claim psychiatric or neurochemical differences as the “reason” why they committed these crimes?

There are millions of people in the world with autism. There are millions of former boxers and football and rugby players who have suffered concussions and do not build bombs. There are billions of us who have successfully passed through adolescence without ever committing an act of terror. So can we please not say that these attributes are the “reasons” why these men have committed these horrendous atrocities?

I fully agree we need better mental health care, better education, better outreach and assimilation to immigrants. But I also believe we need better gun laws to prevent people from having the capacity to commit some of these crimes in the first place. I understand the need to try and find reason behind these acts as they are truly devastating, seeming to stem from a place of pure evil. But let’s not forget that similar atrocities, and worse, are currently being committed around the world in war-torn areas. And placing the blame on a generic mental illness or neurological state, rather than on societal shortcomings or personal perversion, does not help. It only garners distrust and hurts those who do suffer from these illnesses and need help, rather than persecution.

So please, can we just not?

(Thanks to Torey Van Oot for first bringing the boxing article to my attention.)

4 thoughts on “Can we please not?

    • I was generally just having a rant about recent media stories following the Boston bombing last week. I’ve followed (and written) about some of the controversy surrounding neuro-law in the past, but I hadn’t seen that article. It’s just such a sketchy science that I can’t get behind neuro-justification (or whatever you want to call it) for these things.

  1. Can we also say that many of the “children” that have committed these tragedies have been on psychotropic medications and that these absolutely affect the brain and behavior. And can we also say that we live in a nation where the victims of the most recent tragedy should not have to worry about how to pay the doctor bills. In the words of the Brady Campagin ~ We are better than this.

    • Absolutely agree on the medical coverage – it is a basic human right that should be guaranteed in the US. However, the psychotropic medication I feel is another sticky issue. Are we over-medicating our society, particularly for things like ADHD? Absolutely. But again, there are millions of people on these medications who do not become violent, who do not lose all control. Are these medications safe? For some. Should they be prescribed indiscriminately? Absolutely not. Will they turn you into a mass-murderer? No, I don’t believe so.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s